Breast Cancer Cures
Breast cancer cures is a topic of intense interest among women today because, according to the American Cancer Society (ACS), after lung cancer, it is the second leading cause of cancer death among women. It is estimated that 40,480 women will die from breast cancer this year.
Breast cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosed among women in the US, after skin cancers. Of American women who live to 85, one in eight will develop breast cancer. This is up from one in 14 in 1960. The rising number of women afflicted with breast cancer has lead to a huge increase in fund raising for research into breast cancer cures.
While estimates of the total amount spent on breast cancer research vary considerably, there is no doubt that the amount is in the billions of dollars. According to BreastCancer.org this research has lead to “…an overwhelming menu of treatment choices that fight the complex mix of cells in each individual cancer. The decisions – surgery, then perhaps radiation, hormonal (anti-estrogen) therapy, and/or chemotherapy – can feel overwhelming.”
Breast cancer cures is a hotly debated topic today because more and more patients are seeking information on alternative cancer treatments that are less invasive than the standard protocols of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. In fact the demand for alternative treatments is growing every year, in every field of medicine.
To illustrate, consider this revealing study, published in The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, in June 2000, by K. Allen Greiner, et al. This paper reported on a survey of enrolled medical students. It reported that 84% of the students felt that knowledge about alternative medical therapies would be important to them as future physicians. However, only 6% felt they would get adequate exposure to these therapies during their medical school education.
To understand why alternative treatments and cures are not taught in medical school, it helps to know the history of how modern medicine has come to be defined, and controlled. Modern medicine was first defined by The Flexner Report, published in 1910, under the aegis of the Carnegie Foundation. This report was adopted by the American Medical Association as a guideline for reshaping the curriculum of medical education throughout the country. The Flexner Report led to a standardized curriculum in medical schools nationwide, with a single-minded focus on the protocols of mainstream science.
This was the beginning of the marginalization of alternatives to biomedicine because, according to Wikipedia, “Flexner clearly doubted the scientific validity of all forms of medicine other than biomedicine, deeming any approach to medicine that did not advocate the use of treatments such as vaccines to prevent and cure illness as tantamount to quackery and charlatanism.”
In the last 100 years, that marginalization has become institutionalized, as the influence of these foundations and corporate interests have come to dominate both the curriculum, and the research programs, of all medical schools. According to researcher, G. Edward Griffin, these foundations have invested over a billion dollars in the medical schools of America, since 1910. The close connection between these foundations and the corporations that profit directly from patented treatments has been researched and explained in great detail by Griffin and a host of others.
It requires courage and determination to do your own research into alternative, or non-biomedical treatments of breast cancer. You must fore-go the security that is offered by conforming to the breast cancer cures of mainstream allopathic medicine. You must be willing to trust your own judgment. What you will discover in your research is a century long saga that is rich in drama, political and financial intrigue, and genuine heroic geniuses who developed many successful treatments for cancer, including at least two Nobel Prize winners. These treatments cured many patients of cancer and extended the lives of thousands of individuals before they were banned or discredited by the medical establishment.
In fact, when you investigate the field with an open mind, you’ll discover an amazing variety of alternative treatment options that have been demonstrated to cure a wide variety of cancers.
The “inconvenient truth”, however, usually not mentioned in mainstream discussions of breast cancer cures, is that institutional research and treatment of cancer is a multi-billion dollar industry that is protected by some of the largest and most powerful corporations in the world. All cancer cures that use non-patentable, readily available substances, or low cost, tabletop technology, threaten the financial interests this industry. This is the real reason that research into such cures is not pursued and that they are discredited by mainstream medicine.
This is a fact that you will do well to keep it in mind as you continue your research into breast cancer cures. Consider the interests behind all information that you research, mainstream as well as alternative, and, in making your choice of treatment, evaluate the risks versus the potential benefits of every option.
After nearly 2,500 years, the words of Hippocrates, still provide the clearest guidance in choosing our medical treatments; “As to diseases, make a habit of two things – to help, or at least to do no harm.” And, “Natural forces within us are the true healers of disease.”
Breast Cancer Cures